(Presenting Friday, Feb 01, 2019) Due to the ever-increasing gap between the speed of computing elements and the speed at which memory systems can provide data, we are hitting a memory wall. As CRISP center is coming up with new memory architectures to fight this issue, we need good memory benchmarks to evaluate the performance of these emerging architectures. Ideally, these benchmarks should be able to help us finding memory system bottlenecks, should be able to profile read and write channels independently and combined, and should be tunable to match application of interest. Existing memory benchmarks such as STREAM, ApexMAP, Spatter etc. evaluate memory performance using interesting access patterns. However, they are not flexible enough to allow evaluating with all combinations of read and write patterns. We are developing a micro-benchmark where we can tune the access pattern of read and write channels independently using parameters controlling spatial and temporal locality. The benchmark will include a collection of kernel for exercising different areas of the memory system. To ensure that zero redundancy, we are going to employ diversity analysis using metrics like stall percentage, read/write ratio, median stride length, unit stride percentage etc. The current implementation supports few interesting read and write patterns on CPU and GPU platforms using OpenMP and CUDA. Future extension plan includes exploring the effect of memory controller scheduling and finding new patterns in major application domains by eliminating the patterns we already covered.